Resección transescleral combinada versus Braquiterapia con yodo 125 en el tratamiento primario del melanoma de coroides

Aims The aim of this study was to compare transscleral resection technique performed without hypotensive anaesthesia (TSRWH) with iodine-125 brachytherapy (IBT) in the treatment of choroidal melanoma. Patients and methods This was a retrospective surgical cohort study. Nineteen eyes treated with TSRWH were matched with 53 eyes treated with IBT according to: tumour size, distance to fovea, distance to optic nerve, and follow-up time. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), local recurrence, secondary enucleation, metastasis, overall and specific survival, and complications were evaluated. Results Patients treated with TSRWH had significantly better BCVA than those treated with IBT. The local recurrence risk was significantly higher when ciliary body was involved (HR= 11.4, 95% CI 2.24–49.7, P= 0.04). Metastatic disease was observed in 14 of 53 patients (26.4%) in the IBT group vs 3 patients (15.8%) in the TSRWH group (P= 0.531). Multivariate analysis showed that iris involvement (HR= 16.0, 95% CI 4.2–170.2, P= 0.033) and large tumour (HR= 2.3, 95% CI 1.2–4.8, P= 0.04) increased the probability of metastasis. During follow-up, six patients (11.3%) in IBT group died vs two (10.5%) in the TSRWH group (P≥ 0.999). Nine patients required secondary enucleation: 5 (9.4%) in the IBT group vs 4 (21.1%) in the TSRWH group (P= 0.231). The most common complications in IBT group were radiationinduced retinopathy (45.3%), neovascular glaucoma (28.3%), and macular oedema (24.5%), whereas rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (21.1%), ocular hypertension (21.1%), and submacular haemorrhage (15.8%) were the most frequent complications after TSRWH. Conclusion TSRWH is a technically challenging procedure. However, when performed successfully, this technique achieves better preservation of visual acuity than IBT and without the limitations inherent in hypotensive anaesthesia. Eye advance online publication, 1 April 2016; doi:10.1038/eye.2016.49